Friday, March 01, 2024

GET OUR FREE E-NEWSLETTER

“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce

Thousands of Cases of Pulmonary Embolism Reported After COVID Shots

X-rays of the lungs

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) shows that, as of Jan. 20, 2023, there have been 3,855 cases of pulmonary embolism reported following COVID-19 shots.1 A pulmonary embolism is a blood clot that develops in a blood vessel in the body, often in the leg, and travels to the pulmonary artery in the lungs where it blocks blood flow. This causes lung tissue damage and damage to other organs and can escalate to life threatening conditions and even death.2

Since the COVID pandemic, the incidence of acute pulmonary embolisms has increased. Although it is believed that SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause thrombosis (blood clots), the introduction of COVID shots is also suspected to have increased the risk of unprovoked venous thrombus (blood clot originating in the legs) formation and risk of pulmonary embolism.3

Study Shows Thrombotic Adverse Events Linked to Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca Shots

A 2021 study published in the journal Vaccines was conducted to determine the frequency of reported thrombotic adverse events for three COVID biologics developed by Moderna/NIAID, Pfizer/BioNTech and AstraZeneca/Oxford University, specifically Spikevax, Comirnaty and Vaxzevria.4

An analysis was conducted on reports for the three COVID shots submitted to the EudraVigilance database from Feb. 17 to June 14, 2021. There were a total of 729,496 adverse events out of which 3,420 were thrombotic. 58.1 percent of the thrombosis reports were from Astra Zeneca’s Vaxzevria, followed by 32 percent from Pfizer’s Comirnaty and 9.8 percent from Moderna’s Spikevax.

There were 705 reports of pulmonary embolism for the three shots, of which 18.4 percent were from the Spikevax, 32.1 percent from Comirnaty, and 49.5 percent from Vaxzevria. Sixty-three fatalities were recorded, of which six were related to Spikevax, 25 for Comirnaty, and 32 for Vaxzevria.5

The researchers stated that one of the major limitations of the study is underreporting, over reporting and reporting bias of databases such as EudraVigilance, which makes it challenging to identify the true incidence of these potentially fatal pulmonary embolism events.6

No Solid Evidence Showing High Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Post-COVID Patients

Although COVID is widely considered to be a respiratory disease, it has been reported that there is a high incidence of venous thromboembolic complication (blood clot forming in a vein) during SARS-CoV-2 infections.7 However, the true prevalence of thrombosis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown since studies to date do not include systematic and comprehensive investigation protocols.8 In additi9on, researchers have had difficulty interpreting the high incidence of pulmonary embolism in critically ill COVID patients because they are by default a high-risk group with multiple comorbidities.9

The medical literature includes some case reports that raise concerns for a potentially increased risk of pulmonary embolism after SARS-CoV-2 infection but researchers say it is still unclear whether pulmonary embolism following SARS-CoV-2 infection is a manifestation of the post-COVID condition or not. A 2022 study published in SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine found no evidence to prove that a medical history of SARS-CoV-2 infection increases the risk for pulmonary embolism, but that further investigation is needed.10


If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.

Click here to view References:

1 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Results Data current as of 01/20/2023. Jan. 20, 2023.
2 John Hopkins Medicine. Pulmonary Embolism. 2023.
3 Ifeanyi N. et al. Isolated pulmonary embolism following COVID vaccination: 2 case reports and a review of post-acute pulmonary embolism complications and follow-up. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives 2021; 11(6): 877-879.
4 Tobaiqy M. et al. Thrombotic Adverse Events Reported for Moderna, Pfizer and Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccines: Comparison of Occurrence and Clinical Outcomes in the EudraVigilance Database. Vaccines 2021; 9(11): 1326.
5 Ibid.
6 Ibid.
7 Mouzarou A. et al. Pulmonary Embolism in Post-CoviD-19 Patients, a Literature Review: Red Flag for Increased Awareness? SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine 2022; 4(1): 190.
8 Price L. et al. Thrombosis and COVID-19 pneumonia: the clot thickens! European Respiratory Journal 2020; 56(1): 2001608.
9 Mouzarou A. et al. Pulmonary Embolism in Post-CoviD-19 Patients, a Literature Review: Red Flag for Increased Awareness? SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine 2022; 4(1): 190.
10 Ibid.

10 Responses

  1. The shots are “self-adjuvanting”, meaning no additional aluminum adjuvant is used, as is in many vaccines, because the shots in themselves are toxic enough to produce an antibody response. The toxicity of the shots is what is causing clotting. No “spike proteins” need apply. The reason they don’t see clotting from just the alleged infection by covid is that there is no virus. When you inject anyone with a toxic “vaccine” you create all kinds of problems, including clotting.

    1. Totally inappropriate. My landlord’s oldest son died from Delta Covid. His name was Hao Nguyen. He was on an ECMO machine and they had to pull the plug because his lungs didn’t respond even though he was conscious. He was a non-smoking, non-drinking healthy family man. The vaccine probably would have saved his life. I helped him move a couch in the garage and three months later I was at his funeral. You owe me and people like Hao an apology.

      Moderators please remove SoulScare’s comment. thank you.

      1. Inappropriate? Vaccine would have saved his life? No, Ivermectin would have. Here in Australia, Monash University KNEW as early as August 2020 that Ivermectin kills Covid in 48 hours. This cheap, lifesaving, Nobel award winning medication was smeared by the media, suppressed, demonized, and doctors were even banned from prescribing it. Why? And the so-called “vaccines”? I started reading studies at the end of 2020. I’ve spent two solid years reading study after study and the overwhelming consensus is not only that he so-called “vaccines” are not effective, they present NEGATIVE EFFICACY. That’s a nice little term I’ve gotten all too used to reading over and over and over again over the past two years. It is exactly what it sounds like, it means they do more harm than good. In fact the mortality of the “vaccines” is twice what Covid ever was. People are dropping dead on a daily basis because of that garbage, and they were coerced and placed under duress to get injected with it. Children have died and continue to die, it is raising excess deaths and killing fertility GLOBALLY. It is already a catastrophe and its going to get worse! In my personal experience I told my mother not to get injected with big-pharma’s toxic mystery sludge but she didn’t listen. She’s now been very sick for a year as a result. IF she survives this, and we don’t know if she will, we don’t know if she’s ever going to fully recover. Multiple times Pfizer have been exposed over their fraudulent claims and suppressing the damning evidence of their malignant lies and fraud with regard to their “vaccine”. They didn’t test for safety, and we’ve literally seen a Pfizer exec publicly admit before a government committee that they didn’t even test if it stops transmission. Yet the public were told to get it to “stop the spread”. EVERYTHING the public was told was a lie. The data is well and truly in and has been for some time, YOU therefore have absolutely NO excuse for your ignorance and stupidity! Too many have already died and you’re still telling people it might save lives? What the hell is wrong with you? NOBODY owes you an apology, its toxic mRNA injection peddling idiots like YOU who need to apologize to the rest of us!!!

  2. so, all mrna experiments done, prior to mass shot (not a vax, will not call it that) of the population, were stopped due to blod clots and death. The adverse reactions reached a number early on which would have stopped every vaccine from being continued to be given. And remedisver (sp? I can never pronounce it either) was what they gave Ebola patients was deemed, by Fauci, too deadly, for them. It had a 27-29% death rate. so, we gave it to people who went into the hospital with this virus. Many ended up on some type of life support and dead. Lastly, Fauci said, over 10 years ago, that Ivermectin was better than anything, including vaccines, for killing coronaviruses. So, he stopped Ivermectin from being used for this coronavirus.

  3. Blood clots, including pulmonary embolism, are common, and life threatening; it’s become obvious that increased clotting occurs. A D-Dimer laboratory test shows that clotting is occurring. In addition, are the white fibrous clots being found by embalmers. They are even being pulled out of arteries/veins of the living.

    ? STOP THE C19 SHOTS!

Leave a Reply

Search in Archive

Search in Site

To search in site, type your keyword and hit enter