Saturday, February 24, 2024


“You may choose to look the other way, but you can never say again that you did not know.”

— William Wilberforce

Chris Exley, PhD on Vaccines

We are not anti-aluminium. But whenever you introduce something into life… particularly something which you expose humans to, you would normally make it safe first. That would be the first thing you do. In fact, for almost everything else you can think of, you have to do that… you have to demonstrate that something is safe first. That has never been necessary for aluminium. It has never been demonstrated that aluminium is safe. No, there’s never been any legislation in order to do that. And this is a historical thing.

2 Responses

  1. I’ve avoided vaccines ever since they were constantly foisted on me while I served with the American Red Cross and the US Military in Vietnam. I also have Peripheral Neuropathy through out my feet and up both legs!!! Supposedly we were going to have the VA for any long term damage!!! I’ve applied for VA help three times and turned down three because I did not carry a gun!! I have literally HATED the US ever since!!! What a LYING Country!!!

  2. Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive!

    I recommend Injecting Aluminum. I’ve watched many documentaries about vaccines. Dr Exley pointed out a new bizarre vaccine fact I haven’t heard before:

    “In fact, the adjuvant does not require clinical approval at all. It is the vaccine preparation which requires clinical approval, so you may put any adjuvant into a vaccine, it will then go through a clinical approval process and if it gets approved with that adjuvant, regardless of what it is, whether it’s an aluminum adjuvant or another, then it’s the vaccine that will be clinically approved, not the adjuvant.”

    The National Center for Biotechnology Information states that this ‘biased approval process’ is true for other toxic products, such as pesticides, etc. “Roundup was among the most toxic herbicides and insecticides tested. Most importantly, 8 formulations out of 9 were up to one thousand times more toxic than their active principles. Our results challenge the relevance of the acceptable daily intake for pesticides because this norm is calculated from the toxicity of the active principle alone. Chronic tests on pesticides may not reflect relevant environmental exposures if only one ingredient of these mixtures is tested alone.”

    When more unsuspecting, trusting parents learn this, that only one part of vaccines is ‘approved’, I feel this will be of great benefit — a paradigm shifter — of all consumers toward manufacturers of many toxic products!

Leave a Reply

Search in Archive

Search in Site

To search in site, type your keyword and hit enter